The Fruit of Knowledge
Posts tagged fuel economy
Opinion: CO2 credits: The ultimate rebate?
May 19th
Filed under: Government/Legal, Earnings/Financials, Tesla, Electric
Time For Buyers To Have Some Skin In The EV Game
Politicians know that $8- or $9-a-gallon gas like in Europe would end their careers.
The back-and-forth between those writing the fuel economy rules and auto manufacturers is designed to see how far the CO2 regulations can be pushed without inconveniencing the general public.
Rather than taxing fuel like they do in Europe to encourage buyers to opt for the most fuel-efficient vehicles, in America it’s up to the manufacturers to develop a fleet that averages some magic number, in this case 54.5 mpg by 2025. That’s because most politicians know that $8- or $9-a-gallon gas like in Europe would end their careers.
Continue reading CO2 credits: The ultimate rebate?
CO2 credits: The ultimate rebate? originally appeared on Autoblog on Sun, 19 May 2013 15:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Tags: fuel economyCO2 credits: The ultimate rebate?
May 19th
Filed under: Government/Legal, Earnings/Financials, Tesla, Electric
Time For Buyers To Have Some Skin In The EV Game
Politicians know that $8- or $9-a-gallon gas like in Europe would end their careers.
The back-and-forth between those writing the fuel economy rules and auto manufacturers is designed to see how far the CO2 regulations can be pushed without inconveniencing the general public.
Rather than taxing fuel like they do in Europe to encourage buyers to opt for the most fuel-efficient vehicles, in America it’s up to the manufacturers to develop a fleet that averages some magic number, in this case 54.5 mpg by 2025. That’s because most politicians know that $8- or $9-a-gallon gas like in Europe would end their careers.
Continue reading CO2 credits: The ultimate rebate?
CO2 credits: The ultimate rebate? originally appeared on Autoblog on Sun, 19 May 2013 15:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Tags: fuel economyOpinion: CO2 credits: The ultimate rebate?
May 19th
Filed under: Government/Legal, Earnings/Financials, Tesla, Electric
Time For Buyers To Have Some Skin In The EV Game
Politicians know that $8- or $9-a-gallon gas like in Europe would end their careers.
The back-and-forth between those writing the fuel economy rules and auto manufacturers is designed to see how far the CO2 regulations can be pushed without inconveniencing the general public.
Rather than taxing fuel like they do in Europe to encourage buyers to opt for the most fuel-efficient vehicles, in America it’s up to the manufacturers to develop a fleet that averages some magic number, in this case 54.5 mpg by 2025. That’s because most politicians know that $8- or $9-a-gallon gas like in Europe would end their careers.
Continue reading CO2 credits: The ultimate rebate?
CO2 credits: The ultimate rebate? originally appeared on Autoblog on Sun, 19 May 2013 15:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Quick Spin: 2013 Lexus LS 600h L
May 15th
Filed under: Hybrid, Sedan, Lexus, Luxury, Quick Spins
I have spent the last seven days driving the Starfire Pearl (read: white) 2013 Lexus LS 600h L you see here. And after roughly 500 miles of errand-running, highway-cruising, commuting and people-schlepping, I can safely say this: I don’t get it.
The LS hybrid is a nice car. It’s comfortable, has every amenity you’d ever want in a luxury boat, and with its freshened appearance for 2013, it looks modern, integrating the company’s new spindle grille into an overall package that’s elegant. None of this is bad news. But let me explain why I still cannot wrap my head around the overall LS 600h L package:
Driving Notes
- For starters, the LS hybrid mates a 5.0-liter naturally aspirated V8 to a 165-kilowatt electric motor. The gasoline engine on its own is good for 389 horsepower and 385 pound-feet of torque, and with the electric motor factored in, Lexus states that the total system output is a robust 438 hp. (All of that, by the way, resides in what editor Zach Bowman refers to as the “world’s saddest engine bay.”)
- That makes for one quick sedan, even here with all-wheel drive and a hefty 5,159-pound curb weight. Hitting 60 miles per hour takes 5.5 seconds, and top speed is limited to 130 mph.
- Hybrid or no, as you’d expect with a package like this, fuel economy isn’t exactly stellar. The EPA rates the LS 600h L at 19/23/20 miles per gallon (city/highway/combined). My average over the week was 19.2 mpg.
- For comparison, let me introduce you to the non-hybrid LS 460 L AWD, powered by a 4.6-liter V8 that makes 360 hp and 347 lb-ft of torque. Compared to the 600h, the 460 is slower to 60 mph by 0.4 seconds and its fuel economy numbers are 16/23/18 mpg. That’s right: The highway economy number is the same as the hybrid, and the combined rating is only reduced by two mpg.
- Lexus does call the LS 600h L a performance hybrid, so rather than it being a more efficient version of the flagship sedan – sort of the way a Mercedes-Benz S400 Hybrid is really just a more frugal S550 – this electrified LS is supposed to be the zenith of the line, offering the most power, quickest acceleration, and top-level refinement.
- Thing is, it’s not all that good to drive. Even with the Drive Mode Select button toggled to Sport S+, the LS 600h L delivers driving dynamics that are far closer to that of a Hyundai Equus than an Audi A8 or BMW 7 Series. It’s a giant rolling couch, with vague steering, plenty of body roll, and a suspension that, even in its firmest setting, doesn’t offer a whole lot of sport. Comfy and plush, yes, but hardly engaging.
- The interior is really where the LS excels, yet lags. It has every comfort and convenience feature you can imagine, the materials are top notch, and it’s, well, Lexus quiet. But from a user standpoint, there are issues. I know that Audi’s MMI, BMW’s iDrive and Mercedes-Benz’s COMAND aren’t always peachy systems to use, but they at least offer more user-friendly controllers than the horrible mouse-like Remote Touch controller in the LS. Several passengers commented on this during my week with the car, each one of them failing to understand the point. Perhaps Lexus could bring that 12.3-inch screen out a little more and just make it a proper touchscreen interface.
- But here’s where it totally falls apart: as-tested, the LS 600h L I drove stickered for $135,029, including $895 for destination and handling. Remember that LS 460 L AWD I mentioned earlier? The one that’s not much slower and, in most cases, just as efficient as the hybrid? Option it up to the exact same levels of equipment as this 600h and it’s still $34,749 cheaper. That’s right, nearly thirty-five thousand dollars less.
- Or hey, check out the BMW 750Li xDrive sedan. It has 445 horsepower, gets 24 mpg highway, and completely loaded, is $20,000 less than the LS 600h L. And if efficiency really is your thing, allow me to introduce you to the Audi A8L 3.0 TDI that claims up to 36 mpg highway. It starts at $82,500.
- What we have here is car that is, in a vacuum, fine. Everything that it does, it does well enough. But not for this price. And certainly not when there are so many more attractive options for buyers in the segment. Regardless of your preference for power, efficiency or just straight-up luxury, there are better ways to spend your cash than on this LS 600h L.
2013 Lexus LS 600h L originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 15 May 2013 15:43:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Tags: fuel economy, lexus ls 600hQuick Spin: 2013 Lexus LS 600h L
May 15th
Filed under: Hybrid, Sedan, Lexus, Luxury, Quick Spins
I have spent the last seven days driving the Starfire Pearl (read: white) 2013 Lexus LS 600h L you see here. And after roughly 500 miles of errand-running, highway-cruising, commuting and people-schlepping, I can safely say this: I don’t get it.
The LS hybrid is a nice car. It’s comfortable, has every amenity you’d ever want in a luxury boat, and with its freshened appearance for 2013, it looks modern, integrating the company’s new spindle grille into an overall package that’s elegant. None of this is bad news. But let me explain why I still cannot wrap my head around the overall LS 600h L package:
Driving Notes
- For starters, the LS hybrid mates a 5.0-liter naturally aspirated V8 to a 165-kilowatt electric motor. The gasoline engine on its own is good for 389 horsepower and 385 pound-feet of torque, and with the electric motor factored in, Lexus states that the total system output is a robust 438 hp. (All of that, by the way, resides in what editor Zach Bowman refers to as the “world’s saddest engine bay.”)
- That makes for one quick sedan, even here with all-wheel drive and a hefty 5,159-pound curb weight. Hitting 60 miles per hour takes 5.5 seconds, and top speed is limited to 130 mph.
- Hybrid or no, as you’d expect with a package like this, fuel economy isn’t exactly stellar. The EPA rates the LS 600h L at 19/23/20 miles per gallon (city/highway/combined). My average over the week was 19.2 mpg.
- For comparison, let me introduce you to the non-hybrid LS 460 L AWD, powered by a 4.6-liter V8 that makes 360 hp and 347 lb-ft of torque. Compared to the 600h, the 460 is slower to 60 mph by 0.4 seconds and its fuel economy numbers are 16/23/18 mpg. That’s right: The highway economy number is the same as the hybrid, and the combined rating is only reduced by two mpg.
- Lexus does call the LS 600h L a performance hybrid, so rather than it being a more efficient version of the flagship sedan – sort of the way a Mercedes-Benz S400 Hybrid is really just a more frugal S550 – this electrified LS is supposed to be the zenith of the line, offering the most power, quickest acceleration, and top-level refinement.
- Thing is, it’s not all that good to drive. Even with the Drive Mode Select button toggled to Sport S+, the LS 600h L delivers driving dynamics that are far closer to that of a Hyundai Equus than an Audi A8 or BMW 7 Series. It’s a giant rolling couch, with vague steering, plenty of body roll, and a suspension that, even in its firmest setting, doesn’t offer a whole lot of sport. Comfy and plush, yes, but hardly engaging.
- The interior is really where the LS excels, yet lags. It has every comfort and convenience feature you can imagine, the materials are top notch, and it’s, well, Lexus quiet. But from a user standpoint, there are issues. I know that Audi’s MMI, BMW’s iDrive and Mercedes-Benz’s COMAND aren’t always peachy systems to use, but they at least offer more user-friendly controllers than the horrible mouse-like Remote Touch controller in the LS. Several passengers commented on this during my week with the car, each one of them failing to understand the point. Perhaps Lexus could bring that 12.3-inch screen out a little more and just make it a proper touchscreen interface.
- But here’s where it totally falls apart: as-tested, the LS 600h L I drove stickered for $135,029, including $895 for destination and handling. Remember that LS 460 L AWD I mentioned earlier? The one that’s not much slower and, in most cases, just as efficient as the hybrid? Option it up to the exact same levels of equipment as this 600h and it’s still $34,749 cheaper. That’s right, nearly thirty-five thousand dollars less.
- Or hey, check out the BMW 750Li xDrive sedan. It has 445 horsepower, gets 24 mpg highway, and completely loaded, is $20,000 less than the LS 600h L. And if efficiency really is your thing, allow me to introduce you to the Audi A8L 3.0 TDI that claims up to 36 mpg highway. It starts at $82,500.
- What we have here is car that is, in a vacuum, fine. Everything that it does, it does well enough. But not for this price. And certainly not when there are so many more attractive options for buyers in the segment. Regardless of your preference for power, efficiency or just straight-up luxury, there are better ways to spend your cash than on this LS 600h L.
2013 Lexus LS 600h L originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 15 May 2013 15:43:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Official: Consumer Federation says Americans ready for stricter fuel economy standards
May 7th
Filed under: MPG, Legislation and Policy, USA

Americans are moving past the days of screaming eagles and big pick-ups. That’s what the Consumer Federation of America (CFA) says, and it has the survey results to prove it.
The CFA’s 30-page “progress report” (PDF) indicates that folks are ready to embrace fuel-economy standards that will force automakers to reach a Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) level of 54.5 miles per gallon (that’s about 40 mpg in real-world terms). In short, about 60 percent of those surveyed called fuel economy a “very important” factor in their next vehicle purchase and are actually looking for a fuel economy boost of about 30 percent with their next set of wheels. Check out the CFA’s press release below.
Vehicle popularity has moved roughly in tandem with fuel economy and gas prices since 2009. As one broad example, four-cylinder vehicles account for about half of new car sales today, up from less than a third in 2005. For another, last year, advanced power train and diesel vehicles jumped 63 percent to about 540,000 vehicles while plug-in vehicle sales almost tripled to almost 50,000 units. In May, 2009, average gas price in the US was $2.44. Today, it is $3.52.
Continue reading Consumer Federation says Americans ready for stricter fuel economy standards
Consumer Federation says Americans ready for stricter fuel economy standards originally appeared on Autoblog Green on Tue, 07 May 2013 11:55:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Tags: fuel economyQuick Spin: 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK250 BlueTEC 4Matic
May 6th
Filed under: Crossover, Mercedes-Benz, Diesel, Luxury, Quick Spins
We got our first taste of the refreshed 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK lineup last summer, once again affirming our belief that it’s easy to fall in love with the littlest Benz CUV. There’s something sort of charming about the boxy, rugged-looking luxury crossover, and while it won’t set the world on fire in terms of driver engagement, it’s a solid front-runner in the segment.
In addition to the GLK350 – in both rear- and all-wheel-drive forms – Mercedes-Benz has now launched this GLK250 BlueTEC model, packed with a brand new 2.1-liter four-cylinder diesel engine and offered exclusively with the automaker’s 4Matic all-wheel drive. With improved fuel economy and torque-tastic diesel characteristics, this oil-burning GLK could easily be the star child of the company’s small CUV lineup. We hit the roads northwest of Ann Arbor, MI to find out.
Driving Notes
- Mercedes’ new 2.1-liter turbo-diesel engine is good for a healthy 200 horsepower and 369 pound-feet of torque. This is the first application of Merc’s new four-pot diesel here in the US, but we’ll soon be seeing it in the E-Class later this year. Compared to the GLK350, the diesel engine has 102 less horsepower but 96 more foot-pounds of twist. What’s more, the torque thrust is delivered at just 1,600 rpm in the BlueTEC, compared to 3,500 rpm in the GLK350.
- That said, the GLK250 is significantly slower off the line than its naturally aspirated counterpart. Hitting 60 miles per hour in the BlueTEC takes 7.9 seconds, compared to only 6.4 seconds in the GLK350. Of course, the diesel model is slightly heavier than its petrol-drinking kin – 4,321 pounds here versus the 4,079 of a 4Matic-equipped GLK350.
- Where you really win, though, is fuel economy. Mercedes-Benz rates the GLK350 4Matic at 19/24 miles per gallon (city/highway), but the BlueTEC increases those numbers to 24/33. That bests all other competitors in the class, for now. (Remember, there’s an Audi Q5 TDI on the horizon…)
- On the road, the 2.1-liter diesel is perfectly matched with the more relaxed dynamics of the GLK. Even with the more powerful 3.5-liter V6, this CUV isn’t one to be hustled, but we rather like the refined characteristics of the Merc from behind the wheel.
- There is a very small amount of turbo lag at takeoff, but once you hit the meat of the torque band, you’ll never be at a loss for power. The seven-speed automatic transmission is a smooth operator, and has a sport mode that’s more eager to fire off downshifts for spirited driving.
- Steering feel is generally good, but doesn’t offer as much feedback as a BMW X3. That said, the suspension is extremely well-sorted for a small luxury CUV application, providing just the right amount of feedback without ever being too abrasive, even on these large 19-inch wheels wrapped in 235/50R19 Continental 4×4 Contact tires. The brakes, however, feel weak in this GLK. You really need to sink your foot deep into the pedal to achieve adequate stopping force.
- The interior of this GLK is as nice as it ever was. Thanks to that upright, boxy shape, and a tall glasshouse, the cabin feels very open and airy, especially with the shade retracted on that panoramic sunroof. It’s an attractive interior, too, even in the dark hues of our tester. Everything is nicely organized and material quality throughout is nothing short of premium.
- Naturally, a full host of infotainment and safety technology is available, including Mercedes’ MBrace2 system. The interior is quite functional, too, with spacious rear accommodations and up to 54.7 cubic feet of storage with the bench folded flat.
- The GLK250 BlueTEC 4Matic starts at $38,590, which falls in the middle of the $37,090 GLK350 and $39,090 GLK350 4Matic. Our fully optioned tester rang in at $50,485, and before you guffaw, know that an Audi Q5 Hybrid starts at $50,900 – that’s without a single option box ticked.
- Considering the cost savings over the GLK350 4Matic and the huge bump in fuel economy, we don’t expect that the average GLK buyer will miss the added off-the-line oomph of the 3.5-liter engine all that much. This BlueTEC model is easily the best GLK yet.
2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK250 BlueTEC 4Matic originally appeared on Autoblog on Mon, 06 May 2013 14:58:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Tags: mercedes benz glk, fuel economy2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK250 BlueTEC 4Matic
May 6th
Filed under: Crossover, Mercedes-Benz, Diesel, Luxury, Quick Spins
We got our first taste of the refreshed 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK lineup last summer, once again affirming our belief that it’s easy to fall in love with the littlest Benz CUV. There’s something sort of charming about the boxy, rugged-looking luxury crossover, and while it won’t set the world on fire in terms of driver engagement, it’s a solid front-runner in the segment.
In addition to the GLK350 – in both rear- and all-wheel-drive forms – Mercedes-Benz has now launched this GLK250 BlueTEC model, packed with a brand new 2.1-liter four-cylinder diesel engine and offered exclusively with the automaker’s 4Matic all-wheel drive. With improved fuel economy and torque-tastic diesel characteristics, this oil-burning GLK could easily be the star child of the company’s small CUV lineup. We hit the roads northwest of Ann Arbor, MI to find out.
Driving Notes
- Mercedes’ new 2.1-liter turbo-diesel engine is good for a healthy 200 horsepower and 369 pound-feet of torque. This is the first application of Merc’s new four-pot diesel here in the US, but we’ll soon be seeing it in the E-Class later this year. Compared to the GLK350, the diesel engine has 102 less horsepower but 96 more foot-pounds of twist. What’s more, the torque thrust is delivered at just 1,600 rpm in the BlueTEC, compared to 3,500 rpm in the GLK350.
- That said, the GLK250 is significantly slower off the line than its naturally aspirated counterpart. Hitting 60 miles per hour in the BlueTEC takes 7.9 seconds, compared to only 6.4 seconds in the GLK350. Of course, the diesel model is slightly heavier than its petrol-drinking kin – 4,321 pounds here versus the 4,079 of a 4Matic-equipped GLK350.
- Where you really win, though, is fuel economy. Mercedes-Benz rates the GLK350 4Matic at 19/24 miles per gallon (city/highway), but the BlueTEC increases those numbers to 24/33. That bests all other competitors in the class, for now. (Remember, there’s an Audi Q5 TDI on the horizon…)
- On the road, the 2.1-liter diesel is perfectly matched with the more relaxed dynamics of the GLK. Even with the more powerful 3.5-liter V6, this CUV isn’t one to be hustled, but we rather like the refined characteristics of the Merc from behind the wheel.
- There is a very small amount of turbo lag at takeoff, but once you hit the meat of the torque band, you’ll never be at a loss for power. The seven-speed automatic transmission is a smooth operator, and has a sport mode that’s more eager to fire off downshifts for spirited driving.
- Steering feel is generally good, but doesn’t offer as much feedback as a BMW X3. That said, the suspension is extremely well-sorted for a small luxury CUV application, providing just the right amount of feedback without ever being too abrasive, even on these large 19-inch wheels wrapped in 235/50R19 Continental 4×4 Contact tires. The brakes, however, feel weak in this GLK. You really need to sink your foot deep into the pedal to achieve adequate stopping force.
- The interior of this GLK is as nice as it ever was. Thanks to that upright, boxy shape, and a tall glasshouse, the cabin feels very open and airy, especially with the shade retracted on that panoramic sunroof. It’s an attractive interior, too, even in the dark hues of our tester. Everything is nicely organized and material quality throughout is nothing short of premium.
- Naturally, a full host of infotainment and safety technology is available, including Mercedes’ MBrace2 system. The interior is quite functional, too, with spacious rear accommodations and up to 54.7 cubic feet of storage with the bench folded flat.
- The GLK250 BlueTEC 4Matic starts at $38,590, which falls in the middle of the $37,090 GLK350 and $39,090 GLK350 4Matic. Our fully optioned tester rang in at $50,485, and before you guffaw, know that an Audi Q5 Hybrid starts at $50,900 – that’s without a single option box ticked.
- Considering the cost savings over the GLK350 4Matic and the huge bump in fuel economy, we don’t expect that the average GLK buyer will miss the added off-the-line oomph of the 3.5-liter engine all that much. This BlueTEC model is easily the best GLK yet.
2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK250 BlueTEC 4Matic originally appeared on Autoblog on Mon, 06 May 2013 14:58:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Tags: mercedes benz glk, fuel economyQuick Spin: 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK250 BlueTEC 4Matic
May 6th
Filed under: Crossover, Mercedes-Benz, Diesel, Luxury, Quick Spins
We got our first taste of the refreshed 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK lineup last summer, once again affirming our belief that it’s easy to fall in love with the littlest Benz CUV. There’s something sort of charming about the boxy, rugged-looking luxury crossover, and while it won’t set the world on fire in terms of driver engagement, it’s a solid front-runner in the segment.
In addition to the GLK350 – in both rear- and all-wheel-drive forms – Mercedes-Benz has now launched this GLK250 BlueTEC model, packed with a brand new 2.1-liter four-cylinder diesel engine and offered exclusively with the automaker’s 4Matic all-wheel drive. With improved fuel economy and torque-tastic diesel characteristics, this oil-burning GLK could easily be the star child of the company’s small CUV lineup. We hit the roads northwest of Ann Arbor, MI to find out.
Driving Notes
- Mercedes’ new 2.1-liter turbo-diesel engine is good for a healthy 200 horsepower and 369 pound-feet of torque. This is the first application of Merc’s new four-pot diesel here in the US, but we’ll soon be seeing it in the E-Class later this year. Compared to the GLK350, the diesel engine has 102 less horsepower but 96 more foot-pounds of twist. What’s more, the torque thrust is delivered at just 1,600 rpm in the BlueTEC, compared to 3,500 rpm in the GLK350.
- That said, the GLK250 is significantly slower off the line than its naturally aspirated counterpart. Hitting 60 miles per hour in the BlueTEC takes 7.9 seconds, compared to only 6.4 seconds in the GLK350. Of course, the diesel model is slightly heavier than its petrol-drinking kin – 4,321 pounds here versus the 4,079 of a 4Matic-equipped GLK350.
- Where you really win, though, is fuel economy. Mercedes-Benz rates the GLK350 4Matic at 19/24 miles per gallon (city/highway), but the BlueTEC increases those numbers to 24/33. That bests all other competitors in the class, for now. (Remember, there’s an Audi Q5 TDI on the horizon…)
- On the road, the 2.1-liter diesel is perfectly matched with the more relaxed dynamics of the GLK. Even with the more powerful 3.5-liter V6, this CUV isn’t one to be hustled, but we rather like the refined characteristics of the Merc from behind the wheel.
- There is a very small amount of turbo lag at takeoff, but once you hit the meat of the torque band, you’ll never be at a loss for power. The seven-speed automatic transmission is a smooth operator, and has a sport mode that’s more eager to fire off downshifts for spirited driving.
- Steering feel is generally good, but doesn’t offer as much feedback as a BMW X3. That said, the suspension is extremely well-sorted for a small luxury CUV application, providing just the right amount of feedback without ever being too abrasive, even on these large 19-inch wheels wrapped in 235/50R19 Continental 4×4 Contact tires. The brakes, however, feel weak in this GLK. You really need to sink your foot deep into the pedal to achieve adequate stopping force.
- The interior of this GLK is as nice as it ever was. Thanks to that upright, boxy shape, and a tall glasshouse, the cabin feels very open and airy, especially with the shade retracted on that panoramic sunroof. It’s an attractive interior, too, even in the dark hues of our tester. Everything is nicely organized and material quality throughout is nothing short of premium.
- Naturally, a full host of infotainment and safety technology is available, including Mercedes’ MBrace2 system. The interior is quite functional, too, with spacious rear accommodations and up to 54.7 cubic feet of storage with the bench folded flat.
- The GLK250 BlueTEC 4Matic starts at $38,590, which falls in the middle of the $37,090 GLK350 and $39,090 GLK350 4Matic. Our fully optioned tester rang in at $50,485, and before you guffaw, know that an Audi Q5 Hybrid starts at $50,900 – that’s without a single option box ticked.
- Considering the cost savings over the GLK350 4Matic and the huge bump in fuel economy, we don’t expect that the average GLK buyer will miss the added off-the-line oomph of the 3.5-liter engine all that much. This BlueTEC model is easily the best GLK yet.
2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK250 BlueTEC 4Matic originally appeared on Autoblog on Mon, 06 May 2013 14:58:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Report: South Korea firms up fuel economy regs following Hyundai/Kia debacle
Apr 30th
Filed under: Government/Legal, Hyundai, Kia, South Korea
According to a report from Reuters, South Korea’s government has drafted strict new rules for automakers to follow when calculating fuel economy. The legislation comes after a major snafu by Hyundai and Kia that resulted in the automakers lowering the estimated fuel mileage of many popular models – some by several miles per gallon, including the Soul subcompact above – and compensating owners in the US and Canada for the reduction.
The new fuel economy rules were announced by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy in South Korea and will see average mileage ratings drop by roughly three to five percent, according to the report. In addition, manufacturers found guilty of overstating mileage figures will be liable for fines of up to $900,000.
These sweeping new regulations will go into effect in the second half of 2013 and, while they won’t have any effect on EPA estimates for Hyundai and Kia vehicles in the United States, they are expected to result in new ratings for the two automakers in their home market of South Korea, where they enjoy a whopping 70-percent market share.
South Korea firms up fuel economy regs following Hyundai/Kia debacle originally appeared on Autoblog on Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Tags: fuel economy, south korea








